Additional Information On Medicaid
Some of the emails I receive have reams of information that takes time to review and takes effort to wrap my head around it all. This information is vital for you to have though, it might be what you need to, when you need it. I cannot post everything due to copyright laws, so I'll post links to these sources and it will be in your best interest to peruse their sites. Not all of it will be applicable but will offer an education on the subject of Medicaid/Medicare. It's important to identify all of the players and how decisions are being made by those that will ultimately shape health care in this country. Here is an article and link to one such site:
Medicaid’s Role in the Health Benefits Exchange: A Road Map for States:
MEDICAID BLOCK GRANTS AND SPENDING CAPS =
DEVASTATING CUTS TO HEALTH CARE
A block grant or federal spending cap would likely mean devastating cuts to a program that
provides cost-effective health coverage for our country’s lowest-income individuals.
These proposals would shift costs and risks to beneficiaries, participating providers and states.
The impact would fall most heavily on the most vulnerable – the elderly, people with disabilities,
women and children.
A recent Washington Post-ABC News poll found that 69% of Americans oppose cutting
Medicaid.
For over 40 years, Medicaid has provided essential health services for millions of low-income
people.
These benefits, which include care coordination and mental health treatment, are tailored to meet
the needs of vulnerable populations and are often not covered by private insurers.
Medicaid covers 15 million non-elderly, non-disabled adults, most of whom are working parents.
Congress created Medicaid with open-ended federal matching so that states could meet their
residents’ needs, especially in tough economic times when more people are unemployed and
uninsured.
Through joint-funding, the federal government typically covers between 50-75% of each state’s
Medicaid costs.
Medicaid was designed as a counter-cyclical program with the expectation that economic
downturns would increase enrollment.
During the recent recession, Medicaid enrolled an additional 6 million people, providing vital
health care services to those who lost coverage when they lost their jobs.
For millions of seniors and people with disabilities, Medicaid is a vital safety net.
Medicaid provides access to services that Medicare does not cover, such as long-term care in the
community or a nursing facility and oral health.
Medically-necessary services for seniors and people with disabilities account for three-quarters
of all Medicaid expenditures.
Approximately 30 million children, 1 in every 3 in the United States, rely on Medicaid’s
comprehensive pediatric benefit package.
Medicaid’s Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnostic and Treatment services (EPSDT) program
provides early detection and treatment of health problems affecting low-income children.
Early intervention and treatment enables these children to grow up healthy and lead productive
lives.
The average cost per Medicaid beneficiary is significantly lower than under private insurance.
In 2007, the estimated annual per capita cost of Medicaid coverage was $2,100 for a child and
$2,500 for an adult. The cost of private insurance coverage is, on average, 29.5% higher.
The average cost per Medicaid enrollee has been rising less rapidly than the average cost for a
privately insured person.
Medicaid is more efficient than private insurance – costs to administer the program are only
4.5% of total expenditures compared to 16-26% for private insurers.
Block granting or a federal spending cap would underfund Medicaid.
If Medicaid were converted to a block grant, states would get a fixed federal amount to spend,
instead of the current matching structure where states receive funds for each enrollee.
The budget proposal passed by the House of Representatives would fund a block grant well
below current Medicaid expenditures. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that
federal Medicaid spending would be 35% lower in 2022 and 49% lower in 2030. The
underfunding would worsen with each year, resulting in ongoing financial pressure on states.
A proposal by Senators McCaskill and Corker would limit total federal spending to a percentage
of the gross domestic product, and would not exempt Medicaid from automatic spending cuts
necessary to adhere to this cap. In dollar terms, the biggest cuts by far under this proposal would
come from Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.
With inadequate federal funding, states will be forced to absorb additional costs or drastically cut
enrollment and/or services.
Under a block grant or spending cap, states would have to either limit enrollment or be forced to
cover any costs associated with additional enrollees without help from the federal government.
Regardless of any increase in the number of people eligible for Medicaid, the amount of federal
funding would be capped.
States already have significant flexibility over their Medicaid programs.
States currently have considerable flexibility in defining the scope and amount of benefits,
choosing delivery care models including managed care, and adjusting how providers and plans
are paid.
Despite arguments by proponents that block granting will give states more “flexibility,” in fact
much of the existing flexibility will diminish as federal funds are drained from the state’s
revenue streams leaving them with fewer dollars to cover essential services.
http://www.cms.gov" www.cms.gov
Articles On Medicaid
http://www.milwaukeenewsbuzz.com/?p=586891
http://host.madison.com/ct/news/local/health_med_fit/vital_signs/article_6ff5d4d4-758a-11e0-aff6-001cc4c002e0.html
Never Heard Of This Organization
This is one of those websites that will require time and effort to review, I am curious about this organization and what they do, especially how they are funded. Some of the information I read was interesting and sounded promising, but I need to satisfy my curiosity before I make any comments about this. Please read it and let me know what you make of it.
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation: http://www.rwjf.org/
No comments:
Post a Comment